Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Jamaal McNeil v. City of Omaha, et al
as 08-3578
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jamaal A. McNeil
Plaintiff:
De'Vion Murry and DeAndre' Murry
Defendant - Appellee:
Omaha, City of, Omaha Police Department, T. Ringhoff, (Police Officer) and others
Carter et al v. Thiele et al
as 8:2008cv00217
Plaintiff:
John M. Carter and Kristina M. Carter
Defendant:
James Thiele, Chris Wayne, Matthew Jackman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McKoy v. Fahey et al
as 8:2008cv00194
Plaintiff:
Sterling McKoy
Defendant:
Mike Fahey, Hal Daub, Omaha, City of and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Nikolas v. Omaha, City of, et al
as 8:2008cv00087
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Nikolas
Defendant:
Omaha, City of, S. P. Benson, Jr. and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Higgins et al v. Dankiw et al
as 8:2008cv00015
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Higgins, Elizabeth Higgins, Shawn Simoens and others
Defendant:
Joachim Dankiw, Jeanelle Moore, Andrew Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blair v. Omaha, City of et al
as 8:2007cv00295
Plaintiff:
Steven R. Blair
Defendant:
Omaha, City of, Douglas County, Randy Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brizendine v. Omaha, City of et al
as 8:2007cv00277
Plaintiff:
Charles Brizendine
Defendant:
Omaha, City of, Omaha Police Department, Thomas Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McNeil et al v. Omaha, City of et al
as 8:2007cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jamaal A. McNeil, De'Vion Murry and DeAndre' Murry
Defendant:
Omaha, City of, Omaha Police Department, T. Ringhoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Omaha, City of
as 8:2007cv00121
Plaintiff:
Michael B. James
Defendant:
Omaha, City of and Omaha, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
