Cases 191 - 200 of 232
Zambrano v. Cullen
as 5:2009cv04917
Petitioner:
Enrique Zambrano
Respondent:
Robert K. Wong and Vincent Cullen
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project, Habeas Corpus Resource Center and Michael David Laurence
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Freeman v. Calderon
as 5:1999cv20614
Petitioner:
Fred H. Freeman
Respondent:
Arthur Calderon
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Rowland v. Ayers, et al
as 4:1994cv03037
Petitioner:
Guy Kevin Rowland
Respondent:
John N. Maddock and Robert L. Ayers
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and California Appellate Project
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Rodriguez v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2009cv00748
Petitioner:
David Rodriguez
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Brown, et al
as 3:1995cv00305
Plaintiff:
Laverne Johnson
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Defendant:
Jill Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Lopez v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2009cv00301
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lara Lopez
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Willie v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2009cv00082
Petitioner:
Derrick Adams Willie
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Nelson v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2008cv01449
Petitioner:
Bradly Leo Nelson
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hurtado v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2008cv01429
Petitioner:
Richard Anthony Hurtado
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kennedy v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2008cv01268
Petitioner:
Robert R. Kennedy
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
