Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Smith v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv04123
Plaintiff:
Keisha Shavon Smith
Defendant:
United States of America, President Joe Biden, Free Masons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Todd v. Chatonda et al
as 1:2019cv02320
Defendant:
African Family in Africa, Frank Chatonda, Rosita Chatonda and others
Plaintiff:
Ethel Lee Hill Todd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown v. Smith et al
as 1:2018cv01790
Plaintiff:
Curtis Darnell Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
Alana Smith, Taylor Swift, Will Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 08-4191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Romine v. Winfrey
as 1:2008cv06872
Plaintiff:
Carroll Romine
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLER v. IGER et al
as 3:2008cv00049
Plaintiff:
JESHA DONALDSON MILLER
Defendant:
ROGER IGER, SUMNER M. REDSTONE, KATIE COURIC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Riches v. Winfrey et al
as 1:2007cv05984
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey and Harpo Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murphy v. Harpo Studios et al
as 1:2007cv03706
Plaintiff:
Daryl Murphy
Defendant:
Harpo Studios, Oprah Winfrey, Ron Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Natkin, et al v. Winfrey, et al
as 1:1999cv05367
Plaintiff:
Paul Natkin and Stephen Green
Defendant:
Oprah Winfrey , Harpo Productions, Inc , Bob Greene and others
Counter_claimant:
Oprah Winfrey , Harpo Productions, Inc and Bob Greene
Counter_defendant:
Paul Natkin and Stephen Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
