Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Otis Phillips v. Warden James T Vaughn Correctional Center, et al
as 23-2905
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OTIS PHILLIPS
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DELAWARE
YOUNG v. HALLMAN et al
as 2:2023cv00268
Plaintiff:
KARLESTER YOUNG
Defendant:
KIP HALLMAN, PAUL NOEL, JOHN OR JANE DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. STEBERGER et al
as 5:2022cv03464
Plaintiff:
ROBERT OTIS BURKE
Defendant:
CHERYL STEBERGER, LOU CHIRCHELLO, WILLIAM ALBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Marsh et al
as 4:2021cv02181
Petitioner:
Dolphus Otis Fudge
Respondent:
Dr. Robert Marsh, Josh Shapiro and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WILKERSON v. SUPERINTENDENT EASON et al
as 2:2021cv01954
Respondent:
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, SUPERINTENDENT EASON and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Petitioner:
OTIS WLKERSON and OTIS WILKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fudge v. Marsh et al
as 4:2020cv02112
Defendant:
Dr. Jeffrey Boland, John Doe(s), John Doe(s) Correctional Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Dolphus Otis Fudge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Robert May Warden
as 1:2020cv01054
Respondent:
Robert May Warden
Petitioner:
Otis Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reaves v. Butler
as 1:2019cv00138
Petitioner:
Ollie Otis Reaves
Respondent:
Jeffrey Butler and David Ebbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BURNSIDE v. SWINDELL et al
as 3:2018cv00191
Defendant:
STEPHANIE HOOVER and DR. KIM SWINDELL
Plaintiff:
JOHN OTIS BURNSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BURNSIDE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2018cv00251
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
JOHN OTIS BURNSIDE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
