Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Ridenhour et al v. Larson et al
as 3:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Terencia Ridenhour, Danidsha Ayala, Carolina Carrion and others
Defendant:
Timothy Larson, Sean Seepersad, Manisha Juthani and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv09412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy
as 1:2023cv05741
Plaintiff:
Stanley Otis Drummond
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Drummond v. CVS Pharmacy
as 1:2023cv05992
Plaintiff:
Stanley Otis Drummond
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Flowers et al v. The State of Texas et al
as 1:2022cv08648
Plaintiff:
Millania Flowers, Zyyon Sims and Trenesha Biggers
Defendant:
The State of Texas, New York ACS, El Paso Child Protective Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1614
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simmons v. Fitzpatrick et al
as 5:2022cv00757
Plaintiff:
Otis Simmons
Defendant:
William J. Fitzpatrick and Hon. William Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sanchez v. Village of Wolcott et al
as 6:2021cv06438
Plaintiff:
Amy Sanchez
Defendant:
Village of Wolcott and Otis Vezzose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hartwick v. Annucci et al
as 5:2020cv00408
Defendant:
Walter William Smith, Michael Wright, Caryne Demosthenes and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Hartwick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel v. Tucker et al
as 1:2020cv02149
Plaintiff:
Otis A. Daniel
Defendant:
Mr. Steven I. Gutstein and Mr. Robert S. Tucker, Esq.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
