Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 51
RSS Feed | View as table | Sort by last update
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00253
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00141
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
McKinney v. Archey et al
as 1:2008cv00112
Defendant: Sheriff Otis Archey, Cpl Sudgart, Sgt Randy Abertson and others
Plaintiff: Michael P McKinney
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCKINNEY v. ARCHEY et al
as 1:2008cv00471
Plaintiff: MICHAEL P. MCKINNEY
Defendant: SHERIFF OTIS ARCHEY, TRACEY HANNEY, CPL. SUDGART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00025
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00018
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00015
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THOMAS v. CIRKRIT et al
as 1:2007cv01544
Plaintiff: OTIS L. THOMAS
Defendant: STAFF SURGEON, DR. CIRKRIT, RESIDENT DR. KERR, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, ELTON AMOS, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
IBRAHIM et al v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00228
Plaintiff: JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM
Defendant: R. V. VEACH, EDWARD REILLY, DEBORAH SPAGNOLI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?