Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kirsila et al v. Pierce County
as 3:2024cv05314
Plaintiff:
Jamie Kirsila and Otis Williams
Defendant:
Pierce County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Angels Share LLC v. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Co.
as 4:2023cv05133
Plaintiff:
The Angels Share LLC a Washington Limited Liability Company doing business as Otis Kenyon Wine
Defendant:
The Ohio Casualty Insurance Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
McGary v. Linquist
as 3:2022cv05809
Petitioner:
Darnell Otis McGary
Respondent:
Mark Linquist
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lewis v. Lewis et al
as 2:2021cv01308
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Lewis
Defendant:
Otis Eugene Lewis, Donald Trump, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otis Elevator Company et al v. EQC Operating Trust et al
as 2:2020cv00501
Defendant:
Clifford Hearne, EQC Operating Trust, CBRE, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Otis Elevator Company and The Hartford Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Otis v. Bart & Associates, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv05744
Plaintiff:
Kathleen A. Otis
Defendant:
Bart & Associates, Inc., Bart & Associates, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan and Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Otis v. Colvin
as 2:2015cv00064
Plaintiff:
Gregory De Wayne Otis, Sr
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Stokley v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00043
Plaintiff:
Otis A Stokley, Jr
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Attachmate Corporation v. United Technologies Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00799
Plaintiff:
Attachmate Corporation
Defendant:
United Technologies Corporation, Carrier Corporation, Otis Elevator Company and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
