Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Vehrs v. Outlaw Wind Project, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv06046
Plaintiff:
Bradley Vehrs
Defendant:
Outlaw Wind Project, LLC, Invenergy Outlaw Wind Holdings, LLC and Fagen Construction Company of Minnesota, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
THH LLC et al v. MJB Worldwide LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
THH LLC doing business as Truehemphealth, LLC and Rick Zielomski
Defendant:
MJB Worldwide LLC doing business as Lucas Dog Food doing business as Outlaw Products doing business as Outlaw Company, Michael J. Balano, Jeanine Balano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Outlaw et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv00128
Plaintiff:
Karen Outlaw and James M. Outlaw
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vaughn v. Bowers et al
as 4:2014cv01358
Plaintiff:
Lisa Vaughn
Defendant:
Conrad W. Bowers, Joseph Larrew, De Ann Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. United States et al
as 4:2012cv00245
Petitioner:
Cory Bradley
Respondent:
United States and T.C. Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Franklin v. Koster
as 4:2011cv00934
Petitioner:
Jerry D. Franklin
Respondent:
Chris Koster and T.C. Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bradley v. Outlaw
as 4:2011cv00878
Petitioner:
Cory Bradley
Respondent:
T.C. Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hilliard v. Outlaw
as 4:2010cv00662
Plaintiff:
Dedric Hilliard
Defendant:
T.C. Outlaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Neal v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2008cv01157
Plaintiff:
Roland Irving Neal
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, St. Louis Housing Authority, Delores Outlaw and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
