Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Kirsten v. Cape Royale at Ski Harbor Condominium Owners Association, Inc.
as 2:2022cv04109
Plaintiff:
Burton Kirsten
Defendant:
Cape Royale at Ski Harbor Condominium Owners Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00786
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballard v. Jabbar et al
as 4:2020cv00122
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Mike Jabbar, Adam Jabbar and others
Plaintiff:
I.C. Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00939
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Wilson v. Pfaff et al
as 1:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Wilson
Defendant:
John Pfaff, Ann Pfaff, Joseph Abt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart et al v. Village of Innsbrook et al
as 4:2016cv01747
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Stewart, Sandra L. Stewart and Innsbrook Corporation
Defendant:
Village of Innsbrook, Innsbrook Owners Association and Charles Boyce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stewart et al v. Village of Innsbrook et al
as 4:2016cv01748
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Stewart and Sandra L. Stewart
Defendant:
Village of Innsbrook, Innsbrook Owners Association, Innsbrook Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv01162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Darby v. Fulson Management Co. et al
as 5:2014cv06033
Plaintiff:
Vickey R. Darby
Defendant:
Fulson Management Co., All Management Employees, Owners, Co-Owners and Charles S Rockwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
