Cases 1 - 10 of 1,508
Dickie v. Mortimer
as 3:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Julie S. Dickie
Defendant:
Lawrence P. Mortimer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00755
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Moultrie v. Adams et al
as 7:2024cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jules Moultrie
Defendant:
Counselor P. Adams and Major Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. Clark et al
as 3:2024cv00274
Plaintiff:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Defendant:
Alvin "Ted" Clark, J. W. C., C. R. B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Hodges v. Henrico County Risk Management et al
as 3:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Henrico County Risk Management and Bradley Randall Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Hodges v. Beo
as 3:2024cv00272
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hodges
Defendant:
Brittney Lynn Beo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Trademark Infringement
Porter v. Lampman et al
as 1:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Porter
Defendant:
P. Lampman, Joshua Branch and B. Springs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hyatt v. Vidal
as 1:2024cv00574
Plaintiff:
Gilbert P. Hyatt
Defendant:
Katherine K. Vidal
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Non-Infringement- Patent Applicant is Dissatisfied with PTO Decision
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
