Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robert Fennell v. John Wetzel, et al
as 23-1370
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT FENNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, JAMEY P. LUTHER, Superintendent at SCI Smithfield and HARPSTER, Correctional Officer SCI Smithfield
Baker v. Landeck et al
as 3:2021cv02182
Plaintiff:
Tywon Baker
Defendant:
M. Landeck and Jamey P. Luther
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Robinson v. Palco, et al
as 21-2987
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSHUA ROBINSON
Defendant / Appellee:
PALCO, DIetary Staff, HIXSON, Dietary Staff, BIAN, C.O. and others
Fennell v. Wetzel et al
as 4:2021cv01717
Plaintiff:
Robert Fennell
Defendant:
Secretary John E. Wetzel, Superintendent Jamey P. Luther, Officer Harpster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COTTLE v. LUTHER
as 2:2021cv00306
Respondent:
JAMEY P. LUTHER
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER COTTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BURK v. LUTHER et al
as 2:2020cv05693
Respondent:
JAMEY P LUTHER, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ERIC SHOENBERG and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF KATE KOHLER
Petitioner:
ISHMAEL A. BURK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wyatt v. Luther et al
as 1:2020cv00576
Respondent:
Jamie P. Luther and Pennsylvania Attorney Generals Office
Petitioner:
Gregory M. Wyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Darren Eades v. John Wetzel, et al
as 19-3821
Defendant / Appellee:
MS. P. LUTHER, Superintendent, SCI Smithfield, MR. RUPERT, Records Specialist Supervisor, SCI Smithfield, DEBRA JADLOCKI and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARREN EADES
Burk v. Runk et al
as 1:2019cv01358
Plaintiff:
Ishmael Ail Burk, Sr.
Defendant:
Green, Bill Drubelbis, LT. Harper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eades v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2019cv00512
Plaintiff:
Darren Eades
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Swisher, Mr., Rupert, Mr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
