Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Feinberg v. Chardo et al
as 1:2024cv00706
Plaintiff:
Hadassah Feinberg
Defendant:
Francis Chardo, Colin Zwally, Michelle Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Cascia Corporation et al v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Cascia Corporation and Sandy Mariani
Defendant:
Robert M Smith, Robert P Smith, Dorothea Smith Estate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Cascia Corporation v. Smith et al
as 2:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Cascia Corporation
Defendant:
Robert M Smith, Colorado Foot and Ankle Clinic, Dorthea Smith, Estate and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kovalchuk et al v. Smith
as 1:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
Maxim Kovalchuk and Julia Kovalchuk
Defendant:
Hon. Matthew P. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROBICHAW v. MCGEE et al
as 2:2022cv00388
Plaintiff:
RENALDO M. ROBICHAW
Defendant:
SEAN P. MCGEE, MARK S. MURRAY, GARY CHESNEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rager v. Smith et al
as 3:2017cv00649
Plaintiff:
Ronald Ray Rager
Defendant:
P. Smith, O'Brien and Dr. Stanish
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Guido et al
as 3:2016cv02194
Plaintiff:
Jason E. Mitchell
Defendant:
Edward E. Guido, Matthew P. Smith and Stacy B. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2015cv06541
Plaintiff:
CHANDLER P. SMITH
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04747
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE
as 2:2015mc00179
Appellant:
CHANDLER P. SMITH
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MORRISVILLE
Cause Of Action: Motion for Leave to Appeal
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
