Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Stepanoff et al v. Bite Ninja, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stepanoff, Bradley McKinney, Ryan P. Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bite Ninja, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff I.P. v. Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff I.P.
Defendant:
Fast Pace Medical Clinic, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Pace v. Montgomery County, TN Jail
as 3:2023cv01170
Plaintiff:
Archie Lee Pace
Defendant:
Montgomery County, TN Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sheets v. Cumberland County TN Jail et al
as 2:2023cv00041
Plaintiff:
Shawn Sheets
Defendant:
Cumberland County TN Jail and Fast Pace Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pace v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv01065
Plaintiff:
Amber Pace
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Beechboard et al v. Pace Assembly Company
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jamie Beechboard and Gentry Linder
Defendant:
Pace Assembly Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hutchinson v. Fast Pace Medical Clinic PLLC
as 3:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Christy Hutchinson
Defendant:
Fast Pace Medical Clinic PLLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Pace v. Partin et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Samuel Lee Pace, Jr
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Partin, Lt. Tammy Warren, Sgt. Forrest Blackburn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
RPM Care, LLC et al v. StreetDivvy Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02538
Plaintiff:
RPM Care, LLC, Ashley Pace and Scott Coleman
Defendant:
StreetDivvy Inc. and Joshua Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
