Cases
Vicente Borja, et al v. Scott Nago, et al
as 22-16742
Plaintiff / Appellant: VICENTE TOPASNA BORJA, EDMUND FREDERICK SCHROEDER, Jr., RAVINDER SINGH NAGI and others
Defendant / Appellee: SCOTT T. NAGO, in his official capacity as Chief Election Officer for the Hawaii Office of Elections, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL VOTING ASSISTANCE PROGRAM and others
QUEZADA v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv13509
Plaintiff: DESPINA QUEZADA
Defendant: NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES, CHRISTINE NORBUT BEYER, CARMEN DIAZ-PETTI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves et al v. Nago et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00433
Plaintiff: Mr. Randall Jay Reeves, Mr. Ravinder Singh Nagi, Mr. Vicente Topasna Borja and others
Defendant: Federal Voting Assistance Program, Mark Esper, David Beirne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Arroyo-Marquez v. Vines to Wines Services, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01249
Defendant: George Hillberry and Vines to Wines Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Patricia Arroyo-Marquez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Arroyo et al v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv05716
Plaintiff: Patricia Arroyo and Justin Asher
Defendant: Load One, L.L.C. , Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and James Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arroyo v. Astrue We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv09146
Plaintiff: Patricia Arroyo
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Guido Torres-Diaz v. U.S. Attorney General We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-11668
Petitioner: GUIDO ROBERT TORRES-DIAZ, MERLY PATRICIA ARROYO, ANDREA CAROLINA TORRES-ARROYO and others
Respondent: U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?