Cases 21 - 30 of 143
Hampton v. Federal Correctional Complex Petersburg et al
as 1:2010cv01109
Petitioner:
Williams Douglas Hampton
Respondent:
Federal Correctional Complex Petersburg, Engel, Patricia R. Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Locke v. Heck et al
as 1:2010cv01106
Plaintiff:
Donald Ray Locke
Defendant:
Kelli L. Heck, Robert W. Nagle, Patricia R. Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kirk Loney v. Douglas Wilder
as 10-7317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KIRK L. LONEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS L. WILDER, Mayor, sued in both official and individual capacity, RODNEY MONROE, Ex-Richmond Police Chief, sued in both official and individual capacity, MARK SIMS, Officer, Richmond Police Department, sued in both official and individual capacity and others
Winston v. Stansberry
as 3:2010cv00631
Petitioner:
Monte DeCarlos Winston
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Hendrix v. Suhasini Shah
as 10-7220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL HENDRIX
Defendant - Appellee:
SUHASINI SHAH, Medical Doctor and PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00812
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hendrix v. Shah et al
as 1:2010cv00551
Plaintiff:
Michael Hendrix
Defendant:
Suhasini Shah and Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Witherspoon v. Stansberry
as 3:2010cv00323
Petitioner:
Marvin Harold Witherspoon
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brillhart v. Stansberry
as 1:2010cv00483
Petitioner:
Richard Edward Brillhart
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
White v. Stansberry
as 2:2010cv00179
Petitioner:
Travis Amanda White
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
