Cases 51 - 60 of 149
Alls v. Stansberry
as 1:2009cv00506
Petitioner:
Marcus Alls
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Muzikir v. Stansberry et al
as 2:2009cv00208
Petitioner:
Abdul Muzikir
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gary Smith v. McWilliams
as 09-6822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
MCWILLIAMS, (FNU); in her individual capacity, M. J. HOWARD, (FNU); in her own capacity, PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, in her individual capacity and others
Defendant - None:
FNU NAGEL, in his individual capacity and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Marcus Alls v. Patricia Stansberry
as 09-6763
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARCUS ALLS
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden
James Vandivere v. Patricia Stansberry
as 09-6615
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES DOW VANDIVERE
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden of FCC Petersburg Medium
Davis v. Stansberry
as 2:2009cv00131
Petitioner:
Marquis D. Davis
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Loney v. Wilder et al
as 3:2008cv00820
Plaintiff:
Kirk Lee Loney
Defendant:
Douglas L. Wilder, Rodney Monroe, Mark Sims and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Edgar Searcy v. Patricia Stansberry
as 09-6396
Petitioner - Appellant:
EDGAR SEARCY
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, F.C.C. Petersburg, Virginia
Lara v. Stansberry
as 3:2009cv00122
Petitioner:
Gilbert Lara
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ivander James, Jr. v. Patricia Stansberry
as 09-6339
Petitioner - Appellant:
IVANDER JAMES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, Warden, Petersburg FCC Low
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
