Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Jones v. Stansberry et al
as 5:2010cv00017
Petitioner:
Torrance Jones
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry and Zach Roeckeman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cyrus v. Stansberry et al
as 5:2008ct03151
Plaintiff:
Johnny Clifton Cyrus
Defendant:
Patricia R. Stansberry, Unit Manager Shields, J. Demming and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CYRUS v. STANSBERRY et al
as 1:2008cv00267
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY CLIFTON CYRUS
Defendant:
PATRICIA R. STANSBERRY, SHIELDS and J. DEMMING
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Layeni v. Humphries et al
as 5:2008ct03015
Plaintiff:
Olurotimi O. Layeni
Defendant:
C Humphries, Bryan Moon, Patricia R. Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Carlton v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02154
Petitioner:
Warren Lewis Carlton
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Schiralli v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02120
Petitioner:
Frank Schiralli
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Muhammad v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02077
Petitioner:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
McBee v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02075
Petitioner:
Russell Lee McBee
Defendant:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brillhart v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02055
Petitioner:
Richard Edward Brillhart
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Mendez-Morales v. Stansberry
as 5:2007hc02048
Petitioner:
Jose Mendez-Morales
Respondent:
Patricia R. Stansberry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
