Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv06388
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (religion)
Porter v. 2 Unknown Intake Deputies et al
as 1:2026cv06312
Plaintiff:
Stanley Porter
Respondent:
2 Unknown Intake Deputies, State of Georgia and Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Porter v. Labat et al
as 1:2026cv06311
Plaintiff:
Stanley Porter
Defendant:
Patrick Labat and 2 Unknown Intake Sheriffs Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2026cv06310
Plaintiff:
Earnest Beasley
Defendant:
Fulton County, Georgia, Patrick Labat, Officer Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitehead v. Labat et al
as 1:2026cv06203
Plaintiff:
Claxton Whitehead
Defendant:
Patrick Labat, Fulton County Jail, The Superior Courts of Fulton County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Fulton County et al
as 1:2026cv05728
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hawkins
Defendant:
Fulton County and Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 (1)Removal from State Court - Civil Rights
Reevey v. Labat N et al
as 1:2026cv05434
Plaintiff:
Kevin Alicea Reevey
Defendant:
Patrick Labat N and T. Morgen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James McLeroy, et al v. Sheriff, Fulton County Georgia
as 26-13309
Plaintiff:
JAMES MCLEROY and ROSIE GRAY
Defendant:
PATRICK LABAT and SHERIFF, FULTON COUNTY GEORGIA
Unknown:
SERVICE
Robinson v. Labat et al
as 1:2026cv03924
Plaintiff:
Charles Robinson
Defendant:
Patrick Labat, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kodjo v. Labat
as 1:2026cv03528
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Kodjo
Defendant:
Patrick Labat
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
