Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv06875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2020
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ostrowski et al v. Killion et al
as 1:2014cv01727
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Ostrowski and Pennsylvania Civil Rights Law Network
Defendant:
Paul Killion, Robert Fulton, Supreme Court of Pennsylvania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Manning v. Herman et al
as 1:2013cv01426
Plaintiff:
Eugene Douglas Manning
Defendant:
Douglas Herman, Thomas Corbett, Richard Alloway, II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ostrowski v. Killion et al
as 1:2012cv02054
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Ostrowski
Defendant:
Paul Killion, Robert Fulton, Supreme Court of Pennsylania and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FEINGOLD v. OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL et al
as 2:2012cv03516
Plaintiff:
ALLEN FEINGOLD
Defendant:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PAUL KILLION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00005
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
BAILEY et al v. DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2011cv01030
Plaintiff:
DON BAILEY and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-25
Defendant:
DISCIPLINARY BOARD OF THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA , PAUL KILLION and JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen Feingold v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel, et al
as 11-1459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN L. FEINGOLD
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, ANTHONY SEDROSKI and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
