Cases 1 - 10 of 268
Kinney v. Klee et al
as 2:2024cv10592
Plaintiff:
Kinney Dakota and DaKota Kinney
Defendant:
Paul Klee, Loar, Canty and others
Roger Roberts v. Paul Klee
as 21-1594
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROGER ROBERTS
Respondent / Appellee:
PAUL KLEE, Warden
Morris Weatherspoon v. Surjit Dinsa, et al
as 20-1088
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN KLINE, Primary Therapist, JOHN KORNOWSKI, Psychologist, UNKNOWN SPIRKO, Primary Therapist and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MORRIS WEATHERSPOON
Mark White v. Rosilyn Jindal, et al
as 19-2254
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE MCROBERTS, C. CONDON and PAUL KLEE
Defendant:
ROSILYN JINDAL
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK EARL WHITE
Lemuel Brown v. Jeffrey Woods, et al
as 19-2004
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] FILION, RICHARD D. RUSSELL, Manager Grievance Section, Office of Legal Affairs, [UNKNOWN] LAPLANT and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEMUEL D. BROWN
Fisher, Jr. v. Forde et al
as 2:2019cv12203
Defendant:
Maura Corrigan, Michele Forde, Paul Klee and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Fisher, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Curtis Fuller v. William Borgerding, et al
as 19-1776
Defendant / Appellee:
R. HARBAUGH, Nurse, DONALD HAIDER, C.O.D., R. LEWIS, Correctional Officer and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER, aka Raleem X
Curtis Fuller v. Heidi Washington, et al
as 19-1695
Defendant / Appellee:
SIMMONS, Inspector, LARRY BROWN, S.T.G. Coordinator, JOHN CONTRERAS, Inspector and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS FULLER
Fuller v. Borgerding et al
as 2:2019cv11477
Plaintiff:
Curtis Fuller and Raleem X
Defendant:
Richard D. Russell, R. Harbaugh, Patricia Lamb and others
Joel Carter v. Kenneth McKee, et al
as 19-1552
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE MCROBERTS, Deputy Warden, KENNETH T. MCKEE, Warden, Corrections Facility Administrator, S. KINDINGER, Assistant Resident Unit Supervisor and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
