Cases 61 - 70 of 81
Parshall v. Astoria Financial Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv02165
Defendant:
Astoria Financial Corporation, John R. Chrin, John J. Corrado and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Parshall v. Air Methods Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00383
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Air Methods Corporation, Aaron D. Todd, C. David Kikumoto and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Lumos Networks Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Lumos Networks Corp., Lawrence J. Askowitz, Timothy G. Biltz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Genvec, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Genvec, Inc., Wayne T. Hockmeyer, William N. Kelley and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PARSHALL v. WGL HOLDINGS, INC., et al
as 1:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Defendant:
WGL HOLDINGS, INC., MICHAEL D. BARNES, GEORGE P. CLANCY, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Parshall v. Nimble Storage, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01538
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Nimble Storage, Inc., Suresh Vasudevan, Varun Mehta and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parshall v. ZELTIQ Aesthetics. Inc.
as 1:2017cv00270
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
ZELTIQ Aesthetics. Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Paul Parshall v. Heritage Oaks Bancorp et al
as 2:2017cv01939
Defendant:
Michael J. Behrman, Mark C. Fugate, Howard N. Gould and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
PARSHALL v. STONEGATE MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 1:2017cv00711
Defendant:
KEVIN BHATT, JAMES BROWN, HOME POINT FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL PARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Parshall v. Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. et al
as 0:2017cv00700
Plaintiff:
Paul Parshall
Defendant:
Popeyes Louisiana Kitchen, Inc. , John M. Cranor, III, S. Kirk Kinsell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
