Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Munster v. Beltz et al
as 1:2013cv03822
Plaintiff:
Paul William Munster
Defendant:
Stephanie Beltz , Terry Lapids and Monte Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Munster v. Lapids et al
as 1:2013cv03268
Plaintiff:
Paul William Munster
Defendant:
Terry Lapids, Monte Wilson and Stephanie Beltz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv00408
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Earl Venton Buchanan v. Ronald J. Baker et al
as 5:2011cv00418
Defendant:
Ronald J Baker, Tambra Smith Childers, Bob W Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Venton Buchanan
Williams v. Horel et al
as 3:2009cv05314
Plaintiff:
Michael Paul Williams
Defendant:
Robert A. Horel, M. A. Cook, Dayton N. Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Stone et al v. Universal City Studios, LLLP et al
as 2:2008cv05423
Plaintiff:
Adam Matthew Stone and Stone Management, Inc.
Defendant:
Universal City Studios, LLLP, Tannahauser Gate, Inc., Paul William Scott Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Jensen v. Adams et al
as 1:2008cv01214
Plaintiff:
Paul William Jensen
Defendant:
D. Adams, Lopez, Quinones and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 3:2008cv02666
Plaintiff:
Allen Williams, Majorie Williams, Paul Williams, Jr. and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation, SmithKline Beecham Corporation and McKesson Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Williams v. Warden et al
as 1:2008cv00712
Defendant:
Warden, B. Gracewich, C. Pfieffer and others
Plaintiff:
Jean-Paul Williams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jensen v. Yates
as 8:2008cv00148
Petitioner:
Paul William Jensen, .
Respondent:
James A Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
