Cases 41 - 50 of 396
Paul v. Lumpkin
as 5:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Michael Thomas Paul
Respondent:
State of Texas, Ken Paxton and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Andersen v. Paxton et al
as 1:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
David Andersen
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, The City of Granite Shoals, Kirk Jowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Budreau v. The State of Texas et al
as 4:2023cv00380
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Budreau
Defendant:
The State Of Texas, Ken Paxton, Elizabeth Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cunningham v. Turner et al
as 3:2023cv00947
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
DONALD TURNER, SARA BARNETT, GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCalley v. Paxton et al
as 4:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Damaris McCalley
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Craig Turndrup and Linda Turndrup
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sagastume v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00834
Petitioner:
Walter Arnoldo Sagastume
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lytle v. Meachum
as 1:2023cv00441
Plaintiff:
Christopher Sean Lytle
Defendant:
Amy Clark Meachum and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Bazile v. Paxton et al
as 4:2023cv01374
Plaintiff:
Jarred Gerard Bazile
Defendant:
Hon. Ken Paxton, Hon. Bryan Collier, Hon. Patrick L. O'Daniel and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Budreau v. The State of Texas et al
as 3:2023cv00711
Plaintiff:
Anthony Eugene Budreau
Defendant:
The State of Texas, Ken Paxton, Elizabeth Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Drummer v. Paxton et al
as 5:2023cv00389
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackie Drummer
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Alvin C. Brown, Reginal Speller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
