Cases 1 - 10 of 260
Pearson v. Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center et al
as 5:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Billy Pearson
Defendant:
Southwest Mississippi Regional Medical Center, Southwest Health Systems and Lawrence County Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 Emergency Medical Treatment & Active Labor Act
Smothers v. United States of America
as 3:2021cv00151
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smothers
Defendant:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Pearson v. Saul
as 4:2020cv00079
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Timothy Daniel Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Pearson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv00166
Plaintiff:
David Louis Pearson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00031
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Russell v. Wisniewski, M.D. et al
as 1:2020cv00021
Defendant:
Par Pharmaceutical Companies, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Watson Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Mandie Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pearson v. Tantum Companies, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00752
Defendant:
Tantum Companies, LLC, Parrish Restaurants, Ltd. and Back Yard Burgers Development, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jan Augusta Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00108
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00708
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Morales v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv00009
Petitioner:
Luis Gutierrez Morales
Respondent:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
