Cases 1 - 10 of 31
Peavy et al v. CoreCivic, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Neki Peavy and Billy Eugene Kindell
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Inc., CoreCivic of Tennessee, LLC, Vance Laughlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BARKER v. LAMB et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
DEKELDRICK BARKER
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEWIS LAMB, ADA TAMMY OWENS PEAVY, JUDGE JIMMIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brockington v. Rigdon et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cameron Brockington
Defendant:
Randy Rigdon, Jeffrey Deal, Jordan Peavy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
OWEN v. SUMTER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
TONY MICHAEL OWEN
Defendant:
SUMTER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and TAMI PEAVY OWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ROYAL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA PEAVY ROYAL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
THOMPSON v. COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
CARL ASHLEY THOMPSON
Defendant:
COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL, Sheriff ROD HOWELL, Capt JULIUS COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00356
Defendant:
OFFICER MCCOLLUMS, OFFICER PEAVY and WARDEN FORD
Plaintiff:
ADAM PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peavy et al v. Monsanto Company
as 1:2019cv00181
Plaintiff:
Herb Peavy and Vicki Peavy
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUTCHINS v. BRYANT et al
as 5:2017cv00364
Plaintiff:
ARTIS CECIL HUTCHINS
Defendant:
DARRELL BRYANT, CRAIG PEAVY and DAVID AKUNWANNE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aetna Health, Inc. v. Byrd et al
as 3:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Aetna Health, Inc.
Defendant:
Herman L. Byrd, James Peavy and Cramer & Peavy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
