Cases filed in the First Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 867
Eminence Corporation of Maryland v. Pierluisi-Urrutia et al
as 3:2024cv01188
Plaintiff: EMINENCE CORPORATION OF MARYLAND
Defendant: Pedro Pierluisi-Urrutia, Manuel Cidre-Miranda, Treasury Department of Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv40062
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
FOMB, et al v. Pabon Bosques, et al
as 24-1300
Plaintiff: FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO
Appellant: LUIS F. PABON BOSQUES, RAUL MARTINEZ PEREZ, ELVIN A. ROSADO MORALES and others
Defendant: PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of Puerto Rico, PUERTO RICO FISCAL AGENCY AND FINANCIAL ADVISORY AUTHORITY, LUIS M. COLLAZO RODRIGUEZ, in his official capacities as Administrator of the Retirement System for Employees of the Government of Puerto Rico and Executive Director of the Government of Puerto Rico Retirement Board and others
Interested Party: FRANCISCO J. TOLEDO MENDEZ
Turlapati et al v. Boceto 20 LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01155
Plaintiff: Varun Turlapati, Johana Vega and The Conjugal Partnership Constituted by Mr. Vurlapati and Mrs. Vega
Defendant: Boceto 20 LLC, Pedro O. Lpez Montesino, The Conjugal Partnership Constituted by Mr. Lpez and Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Montrond v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40032
Petitioner: Pedro Montrond
Respondent: Superintendent Matthew J. Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Asociacion de Detallistas de Gasolina de PR Inc., et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, et al
as 24-1188
Plaintiff: ASOCIACION DE DETALLISTAS DE GASOLINA DE PUERTO RICO, INC., A&E SERVICE STATION, INC., ANTONIO JUAN LEON and others
Defendant: COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, represented by its Governor Hon. Pedro Pierluisi Urrutia, HON. DOMINGO EMANUELLI HERNANDEZ, as Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, HON. HIRAM TORRES MONTALVO, as Interim Secretary of the Department of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico and others
US v. Hernandez-Negron
as 24-1081
Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant: HECTOR HERNANDEZ-NEGRON, a/k/a Tito Quiju
Interested Party: STEERING COMMITTEE and PEDRO R. PIERLUISI
Cruz v. UIA, et al
as 23-2011
Plaintiff: REYNALDO CRUZ
Defendant: UNION INDEPENDIENTE DE EMPLEADOS DE LA AUTORIDAD DE ACUEDUCTOS Y ALCANTARILLADOS, (UIA), PUERTO RICO AQUEDUCT & SEWER AUTHORITY, PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and others
Amicus Curiae: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF LABOR AND CONGRESS OF INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATIONS
Intervenor: OFFICE AND PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYEES OF THE PUBLIC BUILDINGS AUTHORITY UNION and STATE INSURANCE FUND EMPLOYEES UNION
GoldenTree Master Fund, Ltd. et al v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico et al Future filings must be made in the CM/ECF system of the USBC-PR under Case No. 23-AP-0089 LTS.
as 3:2023cv01568
Plaintiff: GoldenTree Master Fund, Ltd., GTAM 110 Designated Activity Company, GoldenTree Distressed Master Fund III, LTD and others
Defendant: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Governor Pedro Pierluisi, Executive Director Omar J. Marrero-Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clemente Properties, Inc., et al v. Pierluisi-Urrutia, et al
as 23-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant: CLEMENTE PROPERTIES, INC., 21 IN RIGHT, INC., ROBERTO CLEMENTE, JR. and others
Defendant / Appellee: HON. PEDRO R. PIERLUISI-URRUTIA, in his official capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth and in his personal capacity, COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, EILEEN M. VELEZ-VEGA, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Public Works and in her personal capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?