Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Peng Lin v. Alejandro Mayorkas et al
as 2:2023cv06611
Plaintiff:
PENG LIN
Defendant:
SECRETARY ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Alejandro Mayorkas and United States Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Chrome Hearts LLC v. Gnoce Jewelry Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv03321
Plaintiff:
Chrome Hearts LLC
Defendant:
Gnoce Jewelry Inc., Gnoce Trading Co. Limited, Peng Lin and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 la Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
XIAOMI CORPORATION v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE et al
as 1:2021cv00280
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Plaintiff:
Xiaomi Corporation, STEPHEN SEAN ENGLISH, BIN LIN and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Lin et al v. Miracle Curtains, NY, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05627
Plaintiff:
Miracle Curtains 1, Inc., Peng Lin and Miracle Curtains, Inc.
Defendant:
Miracle Window Fashion, Inc., Miracle Curtains, NY, Inc. and Miracle Curtains KC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Lin et al v. Miracle Curtains, NY, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05627
Plaintiff:
Miracle Curtains 1, Inc., Peng Lin and Miracle Curtains, Inc.
Defendant:
Miracle Window Fashion,Inc., Miracle Curtains, NY, Inc. and Miracle Curtains KC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Juul Labs, Inc. v. The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A
as 1:2019cv00715
Defendant:
The Unincorporated Associations Identified in Schedule A, Peng Lin, Kevin Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Juul Labs, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Peng Lin v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70361
Petitioner:
PENG LIN
Respondent:
DANA J. BOENTE, Acting Attorney General
Peng Lin v. Attorney General United State
as 12-2291
Petitioner:
PENG LIN
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Lin v. Holder
as 12-9
Petitioner:
Peng Lin
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
