Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Doe, et al
as 21-1783
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
STATE OF TEXAS, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. Cardona, et al
as 21-1782
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER, ANNE DOE, EQUAL RIGHTS ADVOCATES and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO and others
Victim Rights Law Center, et al v. State of Texas
as 21-1777
Plaintiff:
CHICAGO ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL EXPLOITATION, ANNE DOE, JANE DOE, an individual by and through her mother and next friend Melissa White and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MIGUEL ANGEL CARDONA, in his official capacity as Secretary of Education, SUZANNE B. GOLDBERG, in her official capacity as Acting Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights and US DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Interested Party:
STATE OF TEXAS, LAWYERS' COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS UNDER LAW, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY WOMEN and others
Smith v. Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape
as 3:2007cv02149
Plaintiff:
Dewitt Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Coalition Against Rape
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
