Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Brown v. Tegtmeyer et al
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Marr Peter Brown and Marr Brown
Defendant:
Stephen Tegtmeyer, Malak B Heiny, Donald C Swanson, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Parkview Regional Medical Center
as 1:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Marr Peter Brown and Marr Brown
Defendant:
Parkview Regional Medical Center, Dustin J. Petersen, Tariq M Lescouflair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Warden
as 2:2022cv00148
Petitioner:
Marr Peter Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00422
Petitioner:
Marr Peter Brown
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROWN v. KROH
as 1:2020cv02928
Defendant:
STANLEY KROH
Plaintiff:
PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 1:2020cv02269
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BROWN v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2020cv01020
Defendant:
FISCHER and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Town of Ogden Dunes et al v. United States of America Department of Interior et al
as 2:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Town of Ogden Dunes, Brude Boyer, David Tarpo and others
Defendant:
Secretary David Bernhart, Director David Vela, Lieutenant General Todd T Semonite and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
BROWN v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
as 1:2013cv00262
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF INDIANA
Petitioner:
PETER BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
BROWN v. INDIANA SUPERIOR COURT OF MARION COUNTY
as 1:2011cv00695
Plaintiff:
PETER BROWN
Defendant:
INDIANA SUPERIOR COURT OF MARION COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
