Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Peter DiPietro v. Warden Burlington County, et al
as 19-2107
Respondent: WARDEN CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WARDEN BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN SALEM COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Petitioner: PETER DIPIETRO
DIPIETRO v. WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv12709
Respondent: WARDEN OF THE CAMDEN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN OF THE SALEM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER and WARDEN OF THE BURLINGTON COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Petitioner: PETER DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Peter DiPietro We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 19-2001
Not Yet Classified: MICHAEL DIAMOND, P.A., NEW JERSEY STATE BOARD OF PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMINERS, ANGELA MERLO, Individually and in her official capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00006
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12196
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DIPIETRO
as 1:2017cv12282
Plaintiff: STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Defendant: PETER DIPIETRO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PETER DIPIETRO LIVING TRUST v. POTUS et al
as 1:2017cv12280
Plaintiff: PETER DIPIETRO LIVING TRUST
Defendant: POTUS, SCOTUS, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv12197
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12197
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv12196
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?