Cases 11 - 20 of 109
PETERSON v. WARDEN
as 1:2022cv00412
Petitioner:
ANDREW DALTON PETERSON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. MARION COUNTY JAIL COMMANDER
as 1:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
NOAH A. PETERSON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY JAIL COMMANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv06744
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM E. PETERSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK GROUP INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PETERSON v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02529
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE L. PETERSON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PETERSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv01684
Plaintiff:
AMY PETERSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARSON v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2021cv00805
Defendant:
JOEL LYTTLE, DAVID E COREY, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMIE CARSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PETERSON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv00858
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
GWENDOLYN PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADFORD et al v. MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION et al
as 4:2020cv00205
Plaintiff:
APRIL D'ELIA, LINDA LEARY, GLORIA FRANKLIN and others
Defendant:
MEDVENTURE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION and BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00169
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
PETERSON et al v. BARR et al
as 2:2020cv00350
Plaintiff:
KIMMA GUREL, EARLENE PETERSON, MONICA VIELLETTE and others
Defendant:
T.J. WATSON, WILLIAM P. BARR and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
