Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Vidal v. Public Defenders Office et al
as 2:2023cv01781
Plaintiff:
Francisco Vidal
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office, Petterson-Smith P.D. and Darin F. Imlay P.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Taylor v. The County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2022cv04198
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Taylor
Defendant:
The County of Suffolk, Detective Robert Anderson, Detective John Christie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramler v. Poudre School District Board of Education et al.
as 1:2021cv02538
Plaintiff:
Erin Ramler
Defendant:
Poudre School District Board of Education, Brian Kingsley, Brian (I) Kingsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Therese Natty v. Warden, et al
as 14-14155
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESE VERONICA NATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN PETTERSON, LT. T. BROWN and others
Therese Natty v. Warden, et al
as 14-13791
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERESE VERONICA NATTY
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN, ASSISTANT WARDEN PETTERSON, LT. T. BROWN and others
Lanetta Jones v. Pam Pamler, et al
as 14-12687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANETTA JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PAM PAMLER, ROBERT CARTER, JOHN PETTERSON and others
Jones v. Pamler et al
as 2:2013cv01016
Plaintiff:
Lanetta Jones
Defendant:
Pam Pamler, Robert Carter, John Petterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
