Cases 81 - 90 of 98
Petty v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2011cv00754
Petitioner:
James David Petty
Respondent:
Bobby Stidham and Greg Abbott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petty v. Mount Vernon Independent School District
as 6:2011cv00237
Plaintiff:
Faron Petty
Defendant:
Mount Vernon Independent School District
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1080
Petty v. MetLife, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00053
Plaintiff:
Timothy Earnest Petty
Defendant:
MetLife, Inc. , Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Metlife Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Taylor-Vick v. City of Midland, Texas et al
as 7:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Margaret Jeanne Taylor-Vick
Defendant:
City of Midland, Texas, Jesus Rebledo, Guadalupe Bretado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Richardson v. Hunt County, Texas et al
as 3:2009cv02342
Plaintiff:
Kenneth H Richardson
Defendant:
Hunt County, Texas, Stephen Browlow and Petty's Wrecker Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Petty et al v. Portofino Council of CoOwners, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Petty and Cindy Petty
Defendant:
Portofino Council of CoOwners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Petty v. ConAgro, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00149
Plaintiff:
Christopher Petty
Defendant:
ConAgro, Inc. and Peter Pan Peanut Butter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Slack v. Baker et al
as 6:2009cv00072
Plaintiff:
Reginald Slack
Defendant:
Eddie Baker, Joshua Petty, Ellis A Dubbs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
