Cases 21 - 30 of 44
Phelps v. Andrews
as 5:2017hc02063
Petitioner:
Terrance R. Phelps
Respondent:
Justin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA et al v. RUCHO et al
as 1:2016cv01164
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA , WILLIAM COLLINS , ELLIOTT FELDMAN and others
Defendant:
ROBERT A. RUCHO , DAVID R. LEWIS , TIMOTHY K. MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Wright v. Baynes et al
as 3:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
A. Cotten Wright
Defendant:
John A. Baynes, III, John Baynes Company, Inc., JBC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Moore, Jr. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00157
Defendant:
Alcatel-Lucent USA, Inc, 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and others
Plaintiff:
Moore, Jr, Howard Milton Moore, Jr. and Lena Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Phelps v. PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
as 4:2016cv00070
Defendant:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Brandon L Phelps
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Case Opened in Error
as 4:2016cv00071
Defendant:
PCS Phosphate Company, Inc. and Brandon L Phelps
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Hamilton v. USA
as 5:2015cv00140
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Thomas Phelps Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Respess, et al. v. Crop Production Services, Inc.
as 4:2015cv00176
Defendant:
Crop Production Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Charles Keith Respess, Sr. , John Clay Respess , Slades Creek Farm, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS INC. v. THE ELECTRIC CIGARETTE CO., LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00195
Plaintiff:
REYNOLDS INNOVATIONS INC.
Defendant:
THE ELECTRIC CIGARETTE CO., LLC and VICTORIA PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC., D/B/A NATIONAL AGENTS ALLIANCE V. PHELPS, ET AL. Superior Performers, Inc. d/b/a National Agents Alliance v. Phelps et al
as 1:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
SUPERIOR PERFORMERS, INC.
Defendant:
RYAN J. PHELPS and BRIDGET M. PHELPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
