Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-15115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tommy Turpen, et al v. Douglas County, et al
as 13-13945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOMMY E. TURPEN and DAVID LOGAN TURPEN, as Co-Administrators for the Estate of Tommy Eugene Turpen
Defendant - Appellee:
DOUGLAS COUNTY, PHIL MILLER, individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Douglas County, JIMMY GRAHAM, individually and others
McFarlin v. Douglas County Georgia et al
as 1:2013cv02002
Plaintiff:
Clarence McFarlin, Jr.
Defendant:
Douglas County Georgia, Phil Miller, City of Douglasville, Georgia and others
Presnell v. Douglas County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2013cv01771
Plaintiff:
Alan Eugene Presnell
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office, Phil Miller, Marco Antonio Miranda-Perez and others
Stevenson v. Miller et al
as 1:2013cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kinney R. Stevenson
Defendant:
Phil Miller, John Doe, Correctional Medical Services and others
Jacob Bergeron v. Phil Miller, et al
as 12-13744
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JACOB ANDREW BERGERON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL MILLER, TOM WORTHAN, STEPHANIE EVANS and others
Carlson v. Douglas County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 1:2012cv02352
Plaintiff:
Glenn R. Carlson
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Dept., et al and Phil Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hinson v. Holder et al
as 4:2012cv00356
Petitioner:
Crofton Hinson
Respondent:
Eric H Holder, Janet Napolitano, Phil Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wamathai v. Holder et al
as 4:2012cv00224
Petitioner:
Allan Wamathai
Respondent:
Eric H Holder, Janet Napolitano, Phil Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Holder et al
as 4:2011cv00087
Petitioner:
Williams Johnson
Respondent:
Eric H Holder , Janet Napolitano, Phil Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
