Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01302
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01303
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Aguilar Guzman v. Bausch et al
as 6:2026cv06655
Petitioner:
John Antoni Aguilar Guzman
Defendant:
James Bausch, Philip Rhoney, Todd Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
v. Rhoney et al
as 1:2026cv01301
Defendant:
Philip L. Rhoney, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sturdivant v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company et al
as 1:2026cv07469
Plaintiff:
Loretta Sturdivant
Defendant:
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company, Philip Morris USA Inc., LIGGETT GROUP LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pitts v. Royster et al
as 3:2026cv00894
Plaintiff:
Javonta Pitts
Defendant:
Philip Royster, Lt. Branot, Lt. Wine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Rhoney et al
as 1:2026cv01304
Defendant:
Philip L. Rhoney, Markwayne Mullin, David Venturella and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01299
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Philip et al v. Lewis et al
as 1:2026cv00173
Plaintiff:
Ashton Philip, Demario Johnson and William Stout
Defendant:
Melissa Lewis and Brett Cobble
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01294
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
