Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. v. Phillips Screw Company et al
as 1:2010cv01468
Plaintiff:
Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc., Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc. and Heathcote Holdings Corp., Inc.
Defendant:
Phillips Screw Company and Phillips Fasteners LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Pearson v. Phillips Screw Company et al
as 3:2008cv00953
Plaintiff:
James Pearson, James Pearson and James Pearson
Defendant:
Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jensen, et al v. Phillips Screw, et al
as 07-2766
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS R. JENSEN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
EMMETT COX
Appellant:
STEWART, ESTES & DONNELL, P.L.C.
Defendant - Appellee:
PHILLIPS SCREW COMPANY and PHILLIPS FASTENER PRODUCTS, INC.
Damm v. Phillips Screw Company et al
as 1:2007cv00032
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Damm, Timothy S. Damm and Timothy S. Damm
Defendant:
Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Personal Injury
Phillips Screw Company v. Primesource Building Products, Inc.,
as 1:2007cv10518
Plaintiff:
Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company and others
Defendant:
Primesource Building Products, Inc.,, Primesource Building Products, Inc.,, Primesource Building Products, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Primesource Building Products Inc v. Phillips Screw Company
as 3:2007cv00303
Plaintiff:
Primesource Building Products Inc, Primesource Building Products Inc and Primesource Building Products Inc
Defendant:
Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company, Phillips Screw Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
