Cases 1 - 10 of 77
John Brock v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 26-2869
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROCK
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Keith Bartelli v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 26-2545
Plaintiff:
KEITH BARTELLI
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
In re: Harold Burton
as 26-2323
Petitioner:
In re: HAROLD BURTON
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI and others
David Barksdale v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 26-2293
Plaintiff:
DAVID LESLIE BARKSDALE
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jorge Cintron v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 26-1875
Plaintiff:
JORGE CINTRON
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Ji'Haad Harrison v. J. Terra, et al
as 26-1561
Plaintiff:
JI'HAAD AMORE HARRISON
Defendant:
MS. WOODARD, Psychologist, MS. STICKNEY, Psychologist, C.O. MARQUITA BAREFIELD and others
Frank Nellom v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 26-1355
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Charles Talbert v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 25-3181
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI
Frank Nellom v. District Attorney Delaware County, et al
as 25-3006
Plaintiff:
FRANK NELLOM
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY DELAWARE COUNTY, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI
John Brock v. Superintendent Phoenix SCI, et al
as 25-2950
Plaintiff:
JOHN BROCK
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT PHOENIX SCI, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
