Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Pine Ridge Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 23-1440
Petitioner:
PINE RIDGE COAL COMPANY and PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
Respondent:
DIANNA J. PERDUE, on behalf of Widow of Samuel R. Perdue and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pine Ridge Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 23-1159
Petitioner:
PINE RIDGE COAL COMPANY and PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION
Respondent:
RONALD E. RUNYON and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pine Ridge Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 14-2151
Petitioner:
PINE RIDGE COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and KEITH A. WILLIAMS
Bowles et al v. Massey Energy Company et al
as 2:2012cv05997
Plaintiff:
Mary Bowles and Dustin Wade Cooper
Defendant:
Massey Energy Company
Third_party_plaintiff:
Patriot Coal Corporation , Heritage Coal Company, LLC and Pine Ridge Coal Company, LLC
Third_party_defendant:
ACE American Insurance Company , Indemnity Insurance Company of North America , Pacific Employers Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Walter Smith v. Pine Ridge Coal Company
as 12-1578
Petitioner:
WALTER F. SMITH
Respondent:
PINE RIDGE COAL COMPANY and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Pine Ridge Coal Company, LLC v. Secretary of Labor, et al
as 12-1164
Petitioner:
Pine Ridge Coal Company, LLC
Respondent:
Secretary of Labor and Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission
Hudson v. Pine Ridge Coal Company, LLC
as 2:2011cv00248
Plaintiff:
Gary Hudson
Defendant:
Pine Ridge Coal Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104
PEABODY HOLDING CO. et al v. USA
as 1:2005cv01211
Plaintiff:
PEABODY HOLDING COMPANY, INC., , COLONY BAY COAL COMPANY, , LOGAN FORK COAL COMPANY, and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
