Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00612
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Dean et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, N.A.
Defendant: Stephen Dean, Fraser Clan Consultants LLC, David Patrick Dean and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Edward Osborne v. PNC Bank, et al
as 24-11200
Plaintiff: EDWARD L. OSBORNE
Defendant: PNC BANK, YOUNG BOOZER and TONY S. ALLEN
Rawls et al v. PNC Bank, N.A. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff: John R. Rawls and Margaret A. Rawls
Defendant: PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Robinson v. PNC Bank et al
as 1:2024cv01729
Defendant: National Association (Inc.), PNC Bank and RBC Centura Bank, as Assignee
Plaintiff: Mark Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00547
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
PNC Bank, N.A. v. Wiederhold & Kummerlen, P.A. et al
as 9:2024cv80482
Defendant: Wiederhold & Kummerlen, P.A., WIEDERHOLD, MOSES, KUMMERLEN & WARONICKI, P.A., John Wiederhold and others
Plaintiff: PNC Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Duck et al v. PNC Bank
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff: Brandon Duck and The Estate of Tommy Guy Duck
Defendant: PNC Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60547
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00038
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?