Cases 1 - 10 of 29
ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC. et al v. EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS et al
as 1:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
ADVANCE PUBLICATIONS, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC. and others
Defendant:
EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR U.S. ATTORNEYS and FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Application of the New York Times CompanyIn re: Application of the New York Times Company
as 23-5071
In Re:
In re: Application of the New York Times Company and Charlie Savage for Access to Certain Dockets, Orders, Legal Briefing, and Argument Transcripts Ancillary to January 6 Grand Jury Proceedings and Application of Politico and Kyle Cheney to Unseal All Documents Related to the January 6 Grand Jury Investigation
Petitioner:
New York Times Company and Charlie Savage
Petitioner / Appellant:
POLITICO, LLC and Kyle Cheney, Senior Legal Affairs Reporter
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
In re: Press Application for Access to Judicial Records
as 23-5073
In Re:
In re: Press Application for Access to Judicial Records and Proceedings Ancillary to Certain Grand Jury Proceedings Concerning Donald J. Trump and the Trump Organization
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bloomberg L.P., Cable News Network, Inc., The E.W. Scripps Company and others
Petitioner:
CBS Broadcasting, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., d/b/a ABC News, The Associated Press and others
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
Mac Isaac v. Cable News Network, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00247
Counter Defendant:
John Paul Mac Isaac
Defendant:
Cable News Network, Inc., Adam Bennett Schiff, Politico LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
Robert Hunter Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act
APPLICATION OF POLITICO AND KYLE CHENEY TO UNSEAL ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION
as 1:2022mc00104
In Re:
APPLICATION OF POLITICO AND KYLE CHENEY TO UNSEAL ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION
Petitioner:
KYLE CHENEY and POLITICO
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
APPLICATION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY AND CHARLIE SAVAGE FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN DOCKETS, ORDERS, LEGAL BRIEFING, AND ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS ANCILLARY TO JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS
as 1:2022mc00100
In Re:
APPLICATION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY AND CHARLIE DAVAGE FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN DOCKETS, ORDERS, LEGAL BRIEFING, AND ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS ANCILLARY TO JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS, APPLICATION OF POLITICO AND KYLE CHENEY TO UNSEAL ALL DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION and APPLICATION OF THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY AND CHARLIE SAVAGE FOR ACCESS TO CERTAIN DOCKETS, ORDERS, LEGAL BRIEFING, AND ARGUMENT TRANSCRIPTS ANCILLARY TO JANUARY 6 GRAND JURY PROCEEDINGS
Petitioner:
NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY, CHARLIE DAVAGE, KYLE CHENEY and others
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cable News Network, Inc., et alIn re: Cable News Network, Inc., et al
as 22-3012
In Re:
In re: Cable News Network, Inc., American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., d/b/a ABC News, Associated Press and others
MEADOWS v. PELOSI et al
as 1:2021cv03217
Plaintiff:
MARK MEADOWS
Defendant:
NANCY PELOSI, BENNIE G. THOMPSON, ELIZABETH L. CHENEY and others
Intervenor:
CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC., AMERICAN BROADCASTING COMPANIES, INC., THE ASSOCIATED PRESS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ROTENBERG v. POLITICO LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00903
Plaintiff:
MARC ROTENBERG
Defendant:
POLITICO LLC, PROTOCOL MEDIA, LLC, ROBERT L. ALLBRITTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Don Blankenship v. Bradley Blakeman
as 20-1886
Defendant:
KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN and DOES 1 THROUGH 50
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY BLAKEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DON BLANKENSHIP
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, VOX MEDIA, LLC, THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
