Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Prather v. Christian
as 6:2023cv00187
Plaintiff:
Natalie Prather
Defendant:
John Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00787
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blue et al v. Chickasha City of
as 5:2020cv01210
Plaintiff:
Duke R Keeling, James C Calhoun, Michael Wise and others
Defendant:
Chickasha City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
West et al v. Clairborne et al
as 4:2019cv00720
Defendant:
Holly Masters-Litton, Holly Null and Dixie Clairborne
Plaintiff:
Alan West, Lori Lynn West and Coulson N Prather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States Postal Service v. Prather
as 6:2019cv00228
Plaintiff:
United States Postal Service
Defendant:
Leanda Joanne Prather
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Nicholson et al v. Fresenius USA Inc et al
as 5:2014cv01114
Plaintiff:
Joy Nicholson , Belinda Patrick , Debra Prather and others
Defendant:
Fresenius USA Inc , Fresenius USA Manufacturing Inc , Fresenius USA Marketing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Prather v. Harp et al
as 5:2014cv00722
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Adam Harp, Sappington, Livergood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Phillips et al
as 5:2014cv00630
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Candace Phillips and FNU Blenn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Osage County Bureau of Indian Affairs Agency et al
as 4:2014cv00079
Plaintiff:
John Prather
Defendant:
Osage County Bureau of Indian Affairs Agency, Robin M Phillips, Larraine Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prather v. Payne County Correctional Center et al
as 5:2013cv00020
Plaintiff:
Shan Darntanquian Prather
Defendant:
Payne County Correctional Center and Reese Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
