Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Tapia v. NaphCare Inc et al
as 2:2022cv01141
Plaintiff:
Javier Tapia
Defendant:
NaphCare Inc, Pierce County, Paul Pastor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flarity v. Prather et al
as 3:2020cv06083
Defendant:
Pierce County, David H Prather, et al and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Patrick Flarity
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather v. Brusco Tug & Barge Inc
as 3:2016cv05930
Plaintiff:
Gregory A Prather
Defendant:
Brusco Tug & Barge Inc
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Hos Brothers Construction, Inc. v. Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust et al
as 2:2016cv01099
Plaintiff:
Hos Brothers Construction, Inc.
Defendant:
Western Conference of Teamsters Pension Trust , Chuck Mack , Rome Aloise and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Prather v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00085
Plaintiff:
Teresa L Prather
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prather v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv01858
Plaintiff:
Teresa L Prather
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Vintage Oaks, LLC et al v. QBE Insurance Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv05158
Plaintiff:
Vintage Oaks, LLC , Richard Prather , Sandra K Prather and others
Defendant:
QBE Insurance Corporation and Community Association Underwriters of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Prather v. Governor of the State of Washington et al
as 3:2012cv05100
Plaintiff:
Vincent J. Prather
Defendant:
Governor of the State of Washington , Attorney General of the State of Washington and Bonney Lake Municipal Court The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prather-Exum v. Astrue
as 2:2011cv01458
Plaintiff:
Teresa Prather-Exum
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Prather v. Stephens & Michaels Associates, Inc.
as 2:2010cv00912
Defendant:
Stephens & Michaels Associates, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Prather
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
