Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Ramirez v. Obama
as 3:2023cv04559
Plaintiff:
Elias Torres Ramirez
Defendant:
President Barack Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Frost v. Obama
as 4:2020cv00605
Defendant:
Ex-President Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Vinton Frost
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ou-Young v. Haag et al
as 5:2020mc80010
Defendant:
Google Inc., Alex G. Tse, James A Scharf and others
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P Ou-Young
Theresa Suess v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2017cv08415
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Los Angeles County Dept of Children and Family Services and others
Plaintiff:
Theresa J Suess
Seavon Pierce v. The U.S. Government et al
as 2:2016cv08010
Defendant:
Pierce V. Gonzales, Attorney General Kamala D. Harris, President Barack Obama and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Seavon Pierce v. President Barack Obama et al
as 2:2016cv05387
Defendant:
Barbara A. Boxer, Civil Fraud, Investigations Div, Civil-Criminal Enforcement Division and others
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Boutros v. Obama et al
as 3:2016cv01010
Plaintiff:
Zinia Ezzet Boutros
Defendant:
President Barack Obama, President George Bush, President Bill Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seavon Pierce v. Barack Obama
as 2:2015cv03163
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Mr President Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
(PS) Maxey v. Office of President Barack Obama et al
as 2:2015cv00552
Defendant:
Office of President Barack Obama, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Office of President George H.W. Bush and others
Plaintiff:
(PS) Maxey and James C. Maxey- VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theresa Suess v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 2:2015cv01655
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigations and U.S. President Barack Obama
Plaintiff:
Theresa Suess
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
