Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kimble v. District 39 Probation Office et al
as 7:2024cv00372
Plaintiff:
Eugene Junior Kimble
Defendant:
District 39 Probation Office, Harrisonburg Circuit Courts and Harrisonburg Commonwealth Attorney Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rumph v. Colonial Heights Probation Office
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Ernest Rumph
Defendant:
Colonial Heights Probation Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashton v. Banks et al
as 2:2020cv00624
Defendant:
Chief Probation Officer, Sharonda Banks and Doug Williams
Plaintiff:
Hezron Ashton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Mcclung et al
as 7:2019cv00570
Defendant:
Judge Hines, Boyd, Judge Hamilton and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Bradley Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mueller v. Bennett
as 3:2018cv00528
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, District 32 Deputy Chief Probation Officer, District 32 Chief Probation Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Mueller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. U.S. Probation Office et al
as 3:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
LaBarbra Lavell Jones
Defendant:
U.S. Probation Office, Jamie Pease, Latoya Mobley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lewis v. United States Probation Office Eastern District of Virginia et al
as 3:2010cv00650
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wayne Lewis
Defendant:
United States Probation Office Eastern District of Virginia and Mary Anne Vogel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00104
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01132
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
