Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Gray v. Acuity Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02141
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus A. Gray , Erste-Sparinvest Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H. and Karen Rehm
Defendant:
Acuity Brands, Inc. , Vernon J. Nagel and Richard K. Reece
Movant:
Thomas Henry and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Sprouts Farmers Market Incorporated et al
as 2:2018cv00695
Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Defendant:
Sprouts Farmers Market Incorporated, J Douglas Sanders, Amin N Maredia and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Gray v. Acuity Brands, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00285
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus A. Gray , Erste-Sparinvest Kapitalanlagegesellschaft m.b.H. and Karen Rehm
Defendant:
Acuity Brands, Inc. , Vernon J. Nagel and Richard K. Reece
Movant:
Thomas Henry and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI v. ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC et al
as 2:2017cv01466
Plaintiff:
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant:
ENDO INTERNATIONAL PLC , RAJIV KANISHKA LIYANAARCHCHIE DE SILVA , SUKETU P. UPADHYAY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Ji-Yong Ryu v. HCP, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04981
Movant:
Albert J. Belle and Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Defendant:
Steven M. Cavanaugh, HCP, Inc., HCR ManorCare and others
Interested Party:
City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and Societe Generale Securities Services GmbH
Plaintiff:
Ji-Yong Ryu
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi v. Sprouts Farmers Market Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv00815
Plaintiff:
Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi
Defendant:
Sprouts Farmers Market Incorporated , J Douglas Sanders , Amin N Maredia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
