Cases 1 - 10 of 95
City of Fullerton et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2019cv02321
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
city of fullerton, The People of the State of California, by and through Fullerton City Attorney Richard D. Jones and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
City Of San Jose v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 5:2019cv04529
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Endo Health Solutions, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City Of San Jose and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Ventura v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv06799
Defendant:
Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Allergan Sales, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
County of Ventura
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
County of Alameda, California et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2019cv02307
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
County of Alameda, California and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Irvine et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 4:2019cv02323
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Richard S. Sackler and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF IRVINE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through Irvine City Attorney Jeffrey Melching and The People of the State of California
Not Classified By Court:
California Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of El Monte et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv03588
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, by and through El Monte City Attorney Rick Olivarez, City of El Monte and The People of The State of California
Petitioner:
ALLERGAN FINANCE, LLC, F/K/A/ ACTAVIS, INC., F/K/A WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Lytton Band of Pomo Indians v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv03224
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
LYTTON BAND OF POMO INDIANS
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Tule River Indian Tribe of California v. AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2019cv03222
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
TULE RIVER INDIAN TRIBE OF CALIFORNIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
County of Kern et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2019cv00557
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County of Kern, The People of the State of California, People of the State of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
City of Chula Vista, California v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv01115
Defendant:
Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc., Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
City of Chula Vista, California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.