Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Tywilla Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05031
Plaintiff:
Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano, Linda Meiborg and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00820
Plaintiff:
Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano, Linda Meiborg and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Meadors et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00820
Plaintiff:
Meadors, Tywilla Meadors, Timothy Medrano and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Alvarado-Flores et al v. Garcia-Pineda et al
as 5:2017cv00369
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Alonso-Miranda , Jose de Jesus Alvarado-Flores , Cruz Carachure-Aleman and others
Defendant:
Cirila Garcia-Pineda, Marisa Garcia-Pineda and Ofelio Garcia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hector Molina v. Eric Arnold, et al
as 17-55774
Petitioner - Appellant:
HECTOR PABLO MOLINA
Respondent - Appellee:
ERIC ARNOLD, Acting Warden, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Attorney General and UNNAMED RESPONDENTS
Molina v. Unnamed Respondents
as 3:2016cv00720
Petitioner:
Hector Pablo Molina
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondents
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Molina v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2009cv21343
Plaintiff:
Pablo Molina
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv20642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Paulino Molina v. Eric H. Holder Jr., et al
as 09-70066
Petitioner:
PAULINO MOLINA, AKA Pablo Molina
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, NANCY ALCANTAR, Officer in Charge of the San Francisco Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
