Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Padilla v. Tx. Parole Dept Director et al
as 3:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Tx. Parole Dept Director and Greg Abbott
Padilla v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2022cv00417
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States Government
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2021cv00706
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co and #203rd Dist CT of Dallas Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Target Stores, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00425
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Padilla
Defendant:
Target Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla v. #5 Judicial Dist CT et al
as 3:2020cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
U.S. District CT, 5th Cir. CT of Appls, #203rd judicial Dist CT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles et al
as 3:2019cv01594
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Texas Board of Pardons/Paroles, Texas Prison Parole Depts. and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael H. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. Dallas Co et al
as 3:2019cv01115
Defendant:
Henry Wade, Greg Abbott and City, Town or Municipality of Dallas Co
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FitzPatrick et al v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2019cv00911
Defendant:
Aearo Holding LLC, Aearo, LLC, 3M Company and others
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Padilla and Dustin FitzPatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla v. Texas Board of Pardons and Parole et al
as 3:2019cv00594
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla and Ismael H. Padilla
Defendant:
Texas Board of Pardons and Parole and Gov. of Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Padilla v. United States Court of Fed. Claims et al
as 3:2019cv00483
Defendant:
United States Court of Fed. Claims, Davis Lorie, University of TX Med Branch and others
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
