Cases 31 - 40 of 94
YARNALL et al v. BUCKS COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv01291
Plaintiff:
MARLIN J. YARNALL and YOLANDA YARNALL
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY, BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, BUCKS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
PADILLA v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2014cv00197
Petitioner:
MIGUEL PADILLA
Respondent:
JOHN WETZEL, ROBERT D. GILMORE, STEVEN GLUNT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOMBO, et al. v. PADILLA
as 2:2014cv02851
Plaintiff:
LISA LOMBO and RAMON PADILLA
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION , TARGET STORES , WEATHERPROOFING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PADILLA v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 5:2014cv02102
Plaintiff:
ESTHER R. PADILLA
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
PADILLA et al v. TD BANK, N.A.
as 2:2014cv01276
Plaintiff:
SHEILA PADILLA and EMILIO PADILLA
Defendant:
TD BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PADILLA v. ASPIRA, INC.
as 2:2014cv00615
Plaintiff:
DAVID PADILLA
Defendant:
ASPIRA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
SPEARS et al v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv02451
Plaintiff:
KYLE SPEARS , LAURIE SPEARS , JASON J. BILDERBACK and others
Defendant:
CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION , NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , OXYVINYLS, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
PADILLA v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
as 2:2011cv55988
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS A. PADILLA
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST, ET AL
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
PADILLA v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv55223
Plaintiff:
BENITO PADILLA
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
